Maker verification, in live numbers

Computed from 70 listings. Updated 2026-09-27 — every directory update refreshes this page.

We cross-check every US supplement maker we list against public registries and their own published documents. This page reports what that process finds: how many makers can actually be verified, where claims outrun proof, and what listings still miss. Nothing here is a judgment of any maker. It is a readout of our paper trail.

Registry-listed (NSF/USDA/SQF directory)27 (39%)
Documented (cert PDF on maker site)12 (17%)
Reported (maker claim, no doc yet)24 (34%)
Unverified (nothing checked yet)7 (10%)

39% of listings trace to an independent registry entry. The rest rest on maker-hosted documents, maker claims, or checks still in the queue. How the labels work.

Listings claiming GMP54 (77%)
Listings claiming NSF27 (39%)
Registry-listed (any registry)27 (39%)

Most makers claim GMP. Far fewer appear in a public registry under a confirmable name and address. A claim without a registry entry is not proof of lying — registries are hard to search and names rarely match exactly — but it is exactly the gap buyers should close before signing. That gap is why every profile links its proof.

No MOQ with numbers66 (94%)
No street address published66 (94%)
No COA / lab-test evidence59 (84%)
Fewer than 2 proof links22 (31%)

Unpublished MOQs and city-only addresses are industry-normal, not red flags — but they are why most listings sit at Moderate evidence instead of Strong. Each missing item names its own fix on the profile.

Strong evidence6 (9%)
Moderate evidence63 (90%)
Limited evidence1 (1%)
Listings with a confirmed state: 56 of 70
California14 (20%)
Florida12 (17%)
Utah6 (9%)
New York5 (7%)
Arizona4 (6%)
New Jersey2 (3%)
Pennsylvania2 (3%)
Georgia2 (3%)

If your listing sits below where your paperwork says it should, send proof links — registry entries, cert PDFs, MOQ ranges, address. Free, human-reviewed, and this page moves when your profile does.