We grade the paper trail, not the facility

Every rule below is the actual rule. No hidden factors. No numeric scores shown publicly.

Each listing carries two separate labels. Verification status answers “what did we actually verify?” Evidence level answers “how strong and complete is the evidence behind this listing?” A well-run maker with thin public documentation scores lower than an average maker that publishes everything — and that is by design.

Example: Registry-listed · Moderate Evidence means we confirmed the registry listing, but the profile is missing items like MOQ numbers, street address, or COA evidence. The internal numeric score (0–77) exists only for ranking and testing — it is never shown.

Bands: Strong ≥ 60 (~= registry proof + complete profile), Moderate 35–59, Limited below 35. Operating makers with no red flags never fall to Limited for thin paperwork alone — Limited is reserved for real problems: unreachable site, broker signals, or unsupported claims.

Years in business, facility size, and customer mentions are useful facts but not evidence strength. They appear on each listing as maker-stated facts (“Operating since 1977, as stated by maker”) and earn zero points. Where a fact needs proof — e.g. a dated audit paper — the proof itself scores under evidence.